Quantcast

Wednesday May 16, 2012

Backpage.com’s Sex Ads Continue to Stir Controversy

Backpage.com's Fees

Image by edkohler via Flickr

Recently. The New York Times’ media critic David Carr took a look at Backpage.com, the Village Voice Media’s classified ads site. The website features a section labeled “adult” with categories, such as “escort” and “strippers & strip clubs,” that has received a lot of attention iin the past couple of months, as there have been instances in which the section has been used for the trafficking of minors.

While the site explicitly states it does not allow illegal ads, attorney generals from across the country began questioning and examining the website’s policies in August. But now interfaith social justice groups have also expressed their grave disapproval of the site’s policies, whatever they may be.

“On Backpage.com, you can buy a toaster, a car or a girl for sex,” Rev. Katharine Rhodes Henderson, the president of Auburn Theological Seminary, told Carr.  “We agree with the attorney generals on the legal issues, but we are raising this as a moral issue. Even if one minor is sold for sex, it is one too many,” she stated.

Although the Village Voice Media’s administrators Jim Larkin and Michael Lacey contest that the claims of critics are exaggerated, they have expressed no desire to eliminate classifieds. “We have always had a very libertarian approach to advertising,” Mr. Larkin told Carr, adding that classifieds represented 30 to 35 percent of their business. “We don’t ban cigarettes, we take adult advertising. We take ads that sell guns.”

But the attorney generals and religious minded don’t intend to equivocate on this issue.

“I think we have to be careful to protect the First Amendment rights of publishers, but free speech does not extend to the knowing facilitation of criminal activity,” Rob McKenna, the attorney general of Washington State, stated in the article. “This is not just about children being prostituted, this is about human beings being trafficked into the sex trades, as adults and as children.”

The New York Times

 

  • http://twitter.com/Skirm1 Mr. Bilboe

    Is this article about getting us to believe that freedom of speech counts for some companies, people, but not others? Hmmm. Whats going on here…

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=622103568 Joseph Burlett

    While the village voice is making millions on this crime, they are not alone. This has been an issue for over 10 years with internet marketing of the exploitation of children.In fact, in 1996 the US Government introduced a law that would have protected children from these types of crimes. Bt the time it passed through both the house of representatives and congress, the law no longer provided protection to the children. Instead it provided civil and criminal immunity to the online companies that engage in this crime. Since 1996 companies are not held liable for their involvement in crimes like prostitution or sexual exploitation of women and children.Asking or demanding backpage.com remove sex ads from their site will do little or nothing in regards to ending this crime. The village voice or another of the hundreds of companies out there will just begin posting these ads under other names and URLs.The only way to end this crime and expose these criminals is to demand that congress amend the law that granted protection to these companies in the first place.http://goo.gl/6WpaI